23.4 C
Washington
spot_img

Spirit Mountain: The forgotten bailouts

Date:

Share:

As the community ponders the report issued by the Spirit Mountain Task Force, city leaders have been...

A subscription is required to access this article. Subscribe or click login below:

Use this form to sign up for the FREE
Duluth Monitor Newsletter.

━ more like this

Lester River Rendezvous cancels portion of Sept. 27 festival due to logistical conflicts

The annual Lester River Rendezvous is best known for its re-creation of an 18th-century voyageur camp in Duluth’s Lester Park. Dressed in period attire,...

Juvenile charged for vicious assault of homeless man in Canal Park

At 3:15 in the morning on Aug. 26, 2025, a man waved down Duluth police in Canal Park to report that his cousin (identified...

Window-peeping DECC security guard pleads guilty to recording adolescent in gym

On Sept. 10, 2025, Perry Burke entered a guilty plea to interfering with the privacy of a victim under the age of 18. The...

Monitor launches online video archive of Duluth parks

On the City of Duluth’s website, the Parks and Recreation Department states that the city has 162 parks. When the Monitor encountered this claim,...

City looks to bolster Community Investment Trust fund with ordinance change

On Sept. 4, 2025, during a budget presentation to the Duluth City Council, Mayor Roger Reinert introduced a new Community Investment Trust fund (CIT)...
spot_img

2 COMMENTS

  1. Spirit Mountain is Duluth’s version of a sports stadium issue. This is a very short-sighted, narrow-minded approach to the whole picture. The millions that come into the Duluth economy, not spent at Spirit Mountain, by skiers and snowboarders is a huge factor in its value. As I understood it, that was the point for the project initially. Parks, lakeside amenities, and other attractions cost money and don’t generate direct revenue at all but nobody questions their value to the community.

  2. The debt servicing for $23M of additional “investments” into Spirit Mountain would be almost $2M per year. So a current subsidy of $1.1M, plus another $2M would then become $3M of subsidy per year. The math is simple. Does Duluth want to continue to spend $1.1M per year to support the mountain and have it fade away over the near future, or spend $3M per year and have the mountain fade away over the long future? It cannot be looked at as revenue neutral, ever. That is not the question. It has to be looked at as a costly tourist type attraction that costs significant money every year. Does that justify the priority for spending that it has always been given for 45 years? Lester Golf was supported for almost 90 years, then the City finally punted on that. Is Spirit Mountain halfway done with its life cycle? That is the $23M dollar question. The Return on Investment cited by the “expert” is a wild guess and there is no way to accurately determine that value. If Duluth wants to run the ski hill, it should pony up the money, and not worry about being cash neutral.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here