59.1 F
Duluth
spot_img

Spirit Mountain: The forgotten bailouts

Date:

Share:

As the community ponders the report issued by the Spirit Mountain Task Force, city leaders have been...

A subscription is required to access this article. Subscribe or click login below:

━ more like this

Tallas Bay to be dredged again

Located below Spirit Mountain on the St. Louis River, Tallas Bay is a long, narrow corridor of water which separates the river shoreline from...

Gnesen Township supervisor damages broadband line while digging trench to save township money

Gnesen Township, 13 miles north of Duluth, had been contemplating the installation of lighting for the town hall flagpole for some time. When Township...

Superior landfill gas-to-data project terminated over a year ago

In November of 2023, the City of Superior entered into a contract with Vespene Energy, a California company interested in constructing a small data...

How the data center guided the new Hermantown Comprehensive Plan

The most important document underlying Google’s proposed data center in Adolph is the City of Hermantown’s 2045 Comprehensive Plan. The city would not have...

Broken Burke Apartments elevator makes life difficult for disabled tenants

Managed by Accessible Space Inc. out of St. Paul, the Burke Apartments serve tenants with mobility issues and other physical disabilities. On Aug. 13,...
spot_img

2 COMMENTS

  1. Spirit Mountain is Duluth’s version of a sports stadium issue. This is a very short-sighted, narrow-minded approach to the whole picture. The millions that come into the Duluth economy, not spent at Spirit Mountain, by skiers and snowboarders is a huge factor in its value. As I understood it, that was the point for the project initially. Parks, lakeside amenities, and other attractions cost money and don’t generate direct revenue at all but nobody questions their value to the community.

  2. The debt servicing for $23M of additional “investments” into Spirit Mountain would be almost $2M per year. So a current subsidy of $1.1M, plus another $2M would then become $3M of subsidy per year. The math is simple. Does Duluth want to continue to spend $1.1M per year to support the mountain and have it fade away over the near future, or spend $3M per year and have the mountain fade away over the long future? It cannot be looked at as revenue neutral, ever. That is not the question. It has to be looked at as a costly tourist type attraction that costs significant money every year. Does that justify the priority for spending that it has always been given for 45 years? Lester Golf was supported for almost 90 years, then the City finally punted on that. Is Spirit Mountain halfway done with its life cycle? That is the $23M dollar question. The Return on Investment cited by the “expert” is a wild guess and there is no way to accurately determine that value. If Duluth wants to run the ski hill, it should pony up the money, and not worry about being cash neutral.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here