23.1 C
Washington
spot_img

Monitor reporter points out Planning Department mistake, saves homeowner $917

Date:

Share:

In order for homeowners to be granted a variance exception from city code for a construction project...

A subscription is required to access this article. Subscribe or click login below:

Use this form to sign up for the FREE
Duluth Monitor Newsletter.

━ more like this

Lakeside liquor store owner charged with selling alcohol, cannabis products, and lottery tickets to minors

The owner of a Lakeside liquor store has been charged with nine gross misdemeanors related to selling alcohol and cannabis products to underage customers....

City of Duluth did not require proof of Incline Village developer’s financing before approving TIF subsidy

On June 2, 2025, Duluth Economic Development Authority (DEDA) Director Tricia Hobbs sent Luzy Ostreicher, developer of the Incline Village project, a Notice of...

IRRRB violated Minnesota Data Practices Act in response to public records request

An opinion recently issued by Minnesota Commissioner of Administration Tamar Gronvall concludes that the Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation Board (IRRRB) failed to comply...

West Skyline Parkway rehab project proceeds

The western three miles of Skyline Parkway (between the Magney-Snively parking area and the Becks Road neighborhood) has been closed for the summer to...

Former Moose Lake police chief admits negligence in on-duty collision, denies causing injuries

On March 25, 2025, Barnum resident Daniel Korbel filed a personal-injury lawsuit against the City of Moose Lake and former Moose Lake Police Chief...
spot_img

2 COMMENTS

  1. This is great work on Mark Baker’s part. I sure hope he applies to be on the Planning Commission, as there are two openings and its obvious the Planning Department could use his help at zero cost to the tax payers and those coming forward with improvements to their property.

    I do find the headline here misleading and also the body of the piece. Does the Monitor know now if the City has determined a variance is not needed and returned the fee? If past is the future I would say the City will handle this outside of the sunshine so we will never see this on the agenda again nor spoken of again. I hope someone on the commission follows up in the sunshine. We do have a few commissioners that ask questions. It seems that in all the years I have watched the Planning Commission that we have at least three of nine that ask questions. This current group has a few commissioners that are excellent in their questions and not allowing the City to push the tough ones off.

    I look forward to seeing HOW the City handles this mistake.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here