14.2 C
Washington
spot_img

Vendor estimates suggest hockey booster club overcharged parents for apparel

Date:

Share:

With additional reporting by Sean McGee
As part of the Monitor’s investigation into the financial de...

A subscription is required to access this article. Subscribe or login below:

Use this form to sign up for the FREE
Duluth Monitor Newsletter.

━ more like this

As Swim Creative fails to meet social media management goals, City of Superior considers doubling their compensation

On June 25, 2024, the City of Superior’s Tourism Development Commission approved a six-month marketing contract with Swim Creative. For $1,750 per month, Swim...

Silver Bay City Council includes City Center Park in state bonding request

On May 19, 2025, the Silver Bay City Council considered including $4 million for construction of the proposed City Center Park in its state...

Cause of Spirit Mountain’s maintenance shed fire still undetermined

On the evening of April 26, 2025, Duluth firefighters responded to a report of a blaze on Knowlton Creek Boulevard, in Norton Park. A...

Timber Bay Lodge owner alerted to active burglary by Apple watch

On April 19, 2025, while Ronald and Elizabeth Rykken were in Michigan, they received a notification that Ronald’s Apple watch had been powered up...

McKinley city councilor charged with three felonies related to three-town power outage

On May 12, 2025, Minnesota Power received a phone call from McKinley resident Joseph Vaida, who informed them that he planned to cut a...
spot_img

3 COMMENTS

  1. This is a work of fiction. The district doesn’t purchase uniforms, the companies listed can’t order hockey specific clothing brands (which are more expensive) and the boosters do buy protective equipment at a bulk price and then families buy from the boosters. This isn’t journalism and whoever keeps pushing this is a hack. Does Monitor have no journalistic integrity? Ask your photographer how much his stepdaughter made off the program?

  2. Thank you for your comments. The Monitor’s response follows:

    1) The district purchases uniforms.

    2) The companies listed bid on the items we showed them, which were the items the booster club purchased in 2017.

    3) We have seen no evidence that the boosters “buy protective equipment at a bulk price,” but if anyone can show us a receipt, we will be happy to report it.

    4) If the booster did purchase equipment, it would likely be included under the “Equipment & Misc” line on the budget, not the line being discussed here.

    5) The booster club failed to report income from 2015-2021, and they cannot account for hundreds of thousands of dollars, yet people attack the Monitor’s integrity when we point this out. Unusual priorities.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here