55 F
Duluth
spot_img

Vendor estimates suggest hockey booster club overcharged parents for apparel

Date:

Share:

With additional reporting by Sean McGee As part of the Monitor’s investigation into the financial de...

A subscription is required to access this article. Subscribe or click login below:

━ more like this

Tyler Edwards pleads guilty to 2nd Degree Murder in death of Maxton Gudowski

On April 21, 2026, in St. Louis County District Court, Tyler Edwards entered a guilty plea to 2nd Degree Unintentional Murder in the 2024...

No-bid “change orders” add $2 million to Shoppers Ramp/New Garrick Building project price tag

On Thursday, April 22, 2026, the Duluth Economic Development Authority (DEDA) will consider Resolution 12, which, if approved, will increase the price tag for...

Off-grid container home on Cass County farm triggers regulatory rumble

Is Chad Cane’s great sin going off-grid on the farm? When Cane began building a container home on private land, county officials trespassed on his...

Superior murder trial postponed until October, due to delayed ballistics report

The trial for a 2024 Superior homicide case was previously scheduled to begin on March 23, 2026. However, because a key piece of evidence...

Silver Bay greenhouse sues city for right to grow cannabis

In January 2025, the Silver Bay City Council passed Ordinance 11, which essentially prohibits “any retail cannabis business, temporary cannabis event or other cannabis...
spot_img

3 COMMENTS

  1. This is a work of fiction. The district doesn’t purchase uniforms, the companies listed can’t order hockey specific clothing brands (which are more expensive) and the boosters do buy protective equipment at a bulk price and then families buy from the boosters. This isn’t journalism and whoever keeps pushing this is a hack. Does Monitor have no journalistic integrity? Ask your photographer how much his stepdaughter made off the program?

  2. Thank you for your comments. The Monitor’s response follows:

    1) The district purchases uniforms.

    2) The companies listed bid on the items we showed them, which were the items the booster club purchased in 2017.

    3) We have seen no evidence that the boosters “buy protective equipment at a bulk price,” but if anyone can show us a receipt, we will be happy to report it.

    4) If the booster did purchase equipment, it would likely be included under the “Equipment & Misc” line on the budget, not the line being discussed here.

    5) The booster club failed to report income from 2015-2021, and they cannot account for hundreds of thousands of dollars, yet people attack the Monitor’s integrity when we point this out. Unusual priorities.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here