6.9 C
Washington
spot_img

Vendor estimates suggest hockey booster club overcharged parents for apparel

Date:

Share:

With additional reporting by Sean McGee
As part of the Monitor’s investigation into the financial de...

A subscription is required to access this article. Subscribe or login below:

Use this form to sign up for the FREE
Duluth Monitor Newsletter.

━ more like this

Four charged in illegal spruce top cutting operation

On Oct. 4, 2024, St. Louis County deputies responded to a report about “suspicious activity” in Northland Township (about 35 miles north of Duluth)...

Superior Public Safety Committee recommends spending 50K to resolve “urgent” police department issues

Superior Mayor Jim Paine and City Attorney Frog Prell were in attendance at the Superior Public Safety Committee meeting on April 17, 2025, to...

Spirit Mountain ordered to pay $908,651 to alpine coaster manufacturer

On April 10, 2025, following a four-day trial, a St. Louis County jury found Spirit Mountain liable for $908,651 in damages to Wiegand Sports...

Lakeview Tower first TIF project in Duluth to subsidize vacation rentals

On March 26, 2025, the Duluth Economic Development Authority (DEDA) approved an eighth amendment to the Lakeview Tower development agreement, thereby allowing for 34...

Former Superior Teachers Union president charged with drunk driving, resisting arrest

At 11 p.m. on March 22, 2025, the Superior Police Department received a report of a red Jeep Cherokee driving erratically and striking curbs...
spot_img

3 COMMENTS

  1. This is a work of fiction. The district doesn’t purchase uniforms, the companies listed can’t order hockey specific clothing brands (which are more expensive) and the boosters do buy protective equipment at a bulk price and then families buy from the boosters. This isn’t journalism and whoever keeps pushing this is a hack. Does Monitor have no journalistic integrity? Ask your photographer how much his stepdaughter made off the program?

  2. Thank you for your comments. The Monitor’s response follows:

    1) The district purchases uniforms.

    2) The companies listed bid on the items we showed them, which were the items the booster club purchased in 2017.

    3) We have seen no evidence that the boosters “buy protective equipment at a bulk price,” but if anyone can show us a receipt, we will be happy to report it.

    4) If the booster did purchase equipment, it would likely be included under the “Equipment & Misc” line on the budget, not the line being discussed here.

    5) The booster club failed to report income from 2015-2021, and they cannot account for hundreds of thousands of dollars, yet people attack the Monitor’s integrity when we point this out. Unusual priorities.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here