18.2 C
Washington
spot_img

Planned riverfront park downsized, on hold

Date:

Share:

On July 20, 2020, the Duluth City Council approved Resolution 584, the Riverwest Drive construction ...

A subscription is required to access this article. Subscribe or login below:

Use this form to sign up for the FREE
Duluth Monitor Newsletter.

━ more like this

Cause of Spirit Mountain’s maintenance shed fire still undetermined

On the evening of April 26, 2025, Duluth firefighters responded to a report of a blaze on Knowlton Creek Boulevard, in Norton Park. A...

Timber Bay Lodge owner alerted to active burglary by Apple watch

On April 19, 2025, while Ronald and Elizabeth Rykken were in Michigan, they received a notification that Ronald’s Apple watch had been powered up...

McKinley city councilor charged with three felonies related to three-town power outage

On May 12, 2025, Minnesota Power received a phone call from McKinley resident Joseph Vaida, who informed them that he planned to cut a...

City of Duluth sues Burger King franchisee for noncompliance with city’s Earned Sick and Safe Time ordinance

On March 25, 2025, the City of Duluth filed a lawsuit against Cave Enterprises Operations LLC, seeking damages for Cave Enterprises allegedly violating the...

Duluth mayor, county board chair endorsed aviation tax cuts, didn’t tell constituents

On March 25, 2025, Duluth Mayor Roger Reinert and St. Louis County Board Chair Annie Harala wrote letters to the House Committee on Taxes,...
spot_img

3 COMMENTS

  1. Great report. It amazes me how much tourism tax money the City has spent already. If the tourism recovery takes more than one year the Tiffany glass may be on the auction block again.

  2. The citizens that worked to save the estuary’s shore from a road and parking lot along with a paved road down to the water were Friends of Western Duluth Parks & Trails along with the IKES.

    We won at the commission level because we had two commission meetings on the subject so they understood the City and our position. The sad thing was that the councilor sitting on the Parks Commission at the time decided to write a piece in the DNT on the Monday the Council was to take this up, along with another Councilor Noah Hobbs, on why they were voting FOR the park. We were very frustrated because she was supposed to be on the commission to communicate to the Council what was happening on the commission but she never did explain why the commission voted it down. It’s not recorded but I recall the commission vote to be 3-5 not in favor of the plan. The Council saw this issue within two weeks so the minutes were not available. The Council voted it in at 7-2.

    The other thing is we had said all along we have areas already impacted along the estuary’s shore that could be uplifted with a paddle launch, Pier 7, Indian Point, and Munger Launch. The City said at every meeting that the Munger Launch parking lot was at capacity and at every meeting we would say no it’s not, only on opening of fishing and at tournaments. This is frustrating becasue the City askes for public comments and has stakeholder meetings where we share local knowledge. I guess if they don’t want to hear something, they just don’t comment on it.

    I mention all this here because at some point FIlby Williams will slip this project through because at Riverwest the developers worked with the City to have this launch. Ski Hut is part of the development and pushed very hard to get it in, and Bill Burns will do whatever is needed to get what they want. The City even organized the paddlers and had the owner of the Ski Hut lead the group with the focus on getting this land for a paddle launch that isn’t needed for the public at this site but you can see it is for their business. The St. Louis River Alliance took a strange position on this project by supporting it.

    I may not be around when this comes up again so I am hopeful that people will work to keep the estuary’s shore here from being developed more than it is. We will lose all the wildlife that uses this area for a parking lot and a road so the Ski Hut and the Vacation Dwelling Units have their private little launch at the expense of a nice quiet park that is best paddled and hiked to, not driven to.

    • Thanks for this comment. We cannot let this happen! I cannot fathom putting that road all the way through. They will ruin that little inlet. They’ve already ruined the beautiful natural meadow that used to be there in favor of those ugly box houses. So sad.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here