7 C
Washington
spot_img

Planning commissioners grant front-yard parking variance, urge discussion

Date:

Share:

In June of 2017, the city of Duluth cracked down on certain people who were parking in their front y...

A subscription is required to access this article. Subscribe or click login below:

Use this form to sign up for the FREE
Duluth Monitor Newsletter.

━ more like this

Buhl bar owner charged with pull-tab fraud

The owner of Billy’s Pit Stop Pub n’ Grub in Buhl was recently charged with paying out over $68,000 in pull-tab winnings to herself...

Mayor of Superior proactively bans NDAs minutes after fulfilling Monitor’s data request for NDAs

On Oct. 27, 2025, the Monitor continued its investigation into our local governments’ use of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) by filing a public records request...

St. Louis County Board manipulated public process to silence public input on NDAs

A number of media outlets reported on the events of the St. Louis County Board meeting of Oct. 14, 2025, but none exposed how...

2 city officials signed NDAs when Duluth was being considered for data center project

The City of Hermantown’s proposed data center project has received a lot of public scrutiny in recent weeks, primarily because the project has been...

Endi bankruptcy dismissed; affidavit shows Luzy Ostreicher used rent proceeds for Incline Village project, other unauthorized expenses

On Oct. 9, 2025, in the Southern District of New York, United States Bankruptcy Judge Sean H. Lane dismissed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy case...
spot_img

2 COMMENTS

  1. So, this is an unlawful variance. The regulations themselves cannot cause the “practical difficulty.” There has to be something unique to the property, different than other similarly situated properties. There is nothing. In approving this variance, how is the Commission to handle similar applications? They would have to be approved, as precedence has been set.

  2. I own the house next to the Jilek’s. The city does not enforce this ordinance as they say. The statistics speak for themselves.

    We also have a community center in our block that the city provides inadequate parking for. The Lower Chester ice rink provides only on-street parking and does not have a parking lot. Every other community club provides a parking lot except for Portman. The difference with Portman is that businesses nearby help ease the parking situation. These parking lots are open when Portman needs parking. Lower Chester not only fills the streets, but they frequently park on both sides.

    I talked to the fire chief and he does not support the ordinance as they say. They want the streets clear. When asked about parking in the front yard, he noted that the fire department can still access a house around parked cars. They definitely cannot help adequately when the roads are blocked.

    Our neighborhood has a parking issue. Not because of the residents, but because of the city.

    I also met with the city and talked to Parking Director Mark Bauer. I showed him other houses in violation in the Lakeside area. One was a very large house. I hit the same answer from him when asked why he was targeting our neighborhood and not the rest of the city!!! He asked me to go on record for reporting these houses. I didn’t understand that. If it is a city ordinance, shouldn’t it be enforced city wide?

    Our neighborhood was fine the way it was and fits the area as best we can. If anything, we need the city to help us and put in extra parking to accommodate the community club. I am all for the community club and have supported it during its rebuilding years to save it.

    The way I see it, is why do the Jileks and myself have to pay thousands for an ordinance that is only enforced in a small percentage of areas?

    Thanks for the article and let me know how I can help.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here