St. Louis County

In wake of Tyler decision, lawsuits against St. Louis County begin

By: John Ramos

Date:

Share:

Lawyer in his element
Lawyer in his element

In May of 2023, the United States Supreme Court ruled on the case of Tyler v. Hennepin, finding in f...

A subscription is required to access this article. Subscribe or click login below:

John Ramos
John Ramos
a d v e r t i s e m e n t

━ more like this

DULUTH

Judges issue contradictory rulings in local court cases

0
In July of 2026, a collection agency attempted to collect $462.11 which Duluthian Danielle Miller allegedly owed a payday lending company. This is how...
Hibbing

St. Louis County deputy spots woman picking rocks before meth arrest–an overlooked detail sparks debate

0
Reprinted from guessingheadlights.com with permission from the author. Originally published on October 15, 2026. A Hibbing, Minnesota woman was arrested after deputies reportedly discovered methamphetamine...
Hermantown

DNR responds to Hermantown staff accusations regarding shoreland ordinance

0
At the Hermantown City Council meeting on Oct. 8, 2026, Community Development Director Eric Johnson presented the Council with a resolution which would approve...
Cook County

Former Grand Marais youth leader sentenced for harassing teens

0
In January of 2026, Cook County Sheriff’s deputies arrested 30-year-old church youth leader Micah Avery for harassing and stalking two teenage Grand Marais girls....
DULUTH

Duluth columnist violates journalistic ethics

0
Local journalist Howie Hanson is the proprietor of HowieHanson.com, a Duluth news and opinion blog. In his Oct. 4 column, Howie raved about Community...
Perfect Duluth Day
a d v e r t i s e m e n t
Previous article
As Duluth golf struggles, Nemadji booms
Next article
Rumors of unqualified McDavitt firefighters responding to calls unfounded

3 COMMENTS

  1. Will be interesting to see how the Empire strikes back to recoup the 6+ mil.
    Put a vise grip on your wallets, folks.

  2. I would imagine there are also costs associated with the appraisal, marketing and sale of these properties that would also come off of any positive variance.

    • The US Supreme Court suggested that the costs associated with the appraisal, marketing and sale of these properties would be the counties’ responsibility…

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here