61.1 F
Duluth
Shawn Savela for House District 8B

Years after causeway-removal effort fails, Mud Lake habitat restoration project proceeds

Date:

Share:

The Lake Superior & Mississippi Railroad (LSMR), Duluth’s first railroad, followed the St. Louis...

A subscription is required to access this article. Subscribe or click login below:

━ more like this

DECC seeks naming rights agreement to keep ice in DECC Arena

Although the Duluth Entertainment Convention Center (DECC) has been planning to eliminate ice sports from the DECC Arena since 2023, DECC Executive Director Dan...

As competition grows, Superior continues expansion of broadband network

The Superior City Council approved Ordinance 23-4326 on Nov. 7, 2023, authorizing the creation of a municipal broadband utility, Connect Superior. The city broke...

Commissioner Musolf’s stalker has history of erratic behavior

On May 6, 2026, a union business manager working on a project in Sioux City, Iowa, called the St. Louis County Sheriff’s Office to...

Tallas Bay to be dredged again

Located below Spirit Mountain on the St. Louis River, Tallas Bay is a long, narrow corridor of water which separates the river shoreline from...

Gnesen Township supervisor damages broadband line while digging trench to save township money

Gnesen Township, 13 miles north of Duluth, had been contemplating the installation of lighting for the town hall flagpole for some time. When Township...
spot_img

1 COMMENT

  1. John Ramos was one of many that called attention to what was happening, but what John’s piece never does is mention the community and groups that worked hard to prevent the train from going away. While the reporting was good and helped, as they say, it takes a village! I was chair of the Friends of Western Duluth Parks & Trails. We spent many hours over multiple years and appearances in front of the Parks Commission bringing sunlight to all the issues around this project under two mayors Ness and Larson.

    Anyways, the end result of all the work around the causeway on whether to keep or remove was that the benefits to the natural world were that there is benefits to having it in place, and benefits if it was removed. It was balanced so leaving in place was the result. What I have heard that tipped the scale was that after many test borings of the causeway, they found out that the material would not be usable for the planned remediation project, so leaving it in place was the end result. Creating a second opening in the causeway will help move water back and forth to accomplish the desired effect.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here