Years after causeway-removal effort fails, Mud Lake habitat restoration project proceeds

Date:

Share:

The Lake Superior & Mississippi Railroad (LSMR), Duluth’s first railroad, followed the St. Louis...

A subscription is required to access this article. Subscribe or click login below:

a d v e r t i s e m e n t

━ more like this

Water plant tank failure leaves Duluth water unfluoridated since June

In late June of 2026, a fluoride tank at the city’s Lakewood Water Treatment Plant had to be shut down, due to a leak...

Deyette found guilty of violating restraining order, despite checkmark defense

The long-running case of Andrew Deyette concluded another stage on Nov. 2, 2026, when Lake County District Judge Steven Hanke sentenced Deyette for violating...

MONITOR SCHOOL LEVY GRAPH WRONG

The Monitor humbly acknowledges that the graph we previously published purporting to represent the School District levy referendum increase was incorrect. It depicted a...

The Rice Lake war, Part I

Justin Aleshire’s nine-year tenure as a City of Rice Lake Public Works employee ended on Jan. 29, 2026, when the Rice Lake City Council...

Thoughts on the School District referendum

In a closed-door contract discussion seven years ago, the Duluth School Board admitted it was counting on passage of a levy referendum to cover...
Perfect Duluth Day
a d v e r t i s e m e n t

1 COMMENT

  1. John Ramos was one of many that called attention to what was happening, but what John’s piece never does is mention the community and groups that worked hard to prevent the train from going away. While the reporting was good and helped, as they say, it takes a village! I was chair of the Friends of Western Duluth Parks & Trails. We spent many hours over multiple years and appearances in front of the Parks Commission bringing sunlight to all the issues around this project under two mayors Ness and Larson.

    Anyways, the end result of all the work around the causeway on whether to keep or remove was that the benefits to the natural world were that there is benefits to having it in place, and benefits if it was removed. It was balanced so leaving in place was the result. What I have heard that tipped the scale was that after many test borings of the causeway, they found out that the material would not be usable for the planned remediation project, so leaving it in place was the end result. Creating a second opening in the causeway will help move water back and forth to accomplish the desired effect.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here